Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 499 A.2d 889 - Simpson v. Lee

Simpson v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

2 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2018

2 district · 11 state decisions

601985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Quaker Action Group v. Hickel · 55 Cal. 2d 597 - Jordan v. Talbot · Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. Madison Hotel, Inc. · Mendes v. Johnson · 9 Cal. 3d 39 - Kassan v. Stout

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Mendes v. Johnson, 389 A.2d at 787 , this court, sitting en banc, abrogated the landlord’s common law right of self-help and held that the legislatively created remedies for reacquiring possession are exclusive. The court held that Congress had, by necessary implication, abolished the common-law right of self-help when it provided a statutory summary proee- dure. Id. at 786 . Although Mendes v. Johnson involved a residential tenancy, the court, by specifically overruling Snitman v. Goodman, 118 A.2d 394 (D.C.1955), made clear that the rationale for its decision is equally applicable to commercial tenancies, and Mendes v. Johnson has been so construed. See Davis v. Gulf Oil Corp., 485 A.2d 160, 173 (D.C.1984).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.