United States v. Bragan’s Empirical Analysis
499 F.2d 1376 · 1974
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2005 · most notably United States v. Gallop (1988), United States v. Burton (1978)
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Alderman v. United States · Ungar v. Sarafite · United States v. White · O’Callahan v. Parker, Warden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause Bragan's victims consented to the introduction into evidence of their wiretapped conversation, the exclusionary rule of 18 U.S.C. § 2515 did not render inadmissible the wiretaps Bragan made in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2511.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“effectiveness of substitute counsel is not a relevant consideration when he is not counsel of choice”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.