Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 499 F.3d 2 - Jennings v. Jones

Jennings v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

499 F.3d 2 · 2007

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
3
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 54 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Estate of Bennett v. Wainwright (2008), Morelli v. Webster (2009)

25 federal appellate · 54 district · 3 state decisions

550200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Malley v. Briggs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “requires careful attention to the facts and circumstances of each particular case, including the severity of -34- the crime at issue, whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others, and whether he is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[n]ot every push or shove, even if it may later seem unnecessary in the peace of a judge’s chambers, violates the Fourth Amendment. The calculus of reasonableness must embody allowance for the fact that police officers are often forced to make split-second judgments — in circumstances that are tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving — about the amount of force that is necessary in a particular situation.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “a plaintiff must show that the defendant officer employed force that was unreasonable under the circumstances.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.