Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 499 F.3d 616 - Parker v. Goodman

Parker v. Goodman’s Empirical Analysis

499 F.3d 616 · 2007

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 28 U.S.C. § 2283

Relies on Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank · Mitchum v. Foster · Toucey v. New York Life Insurance · Vendo Company v. Lektro Vend Corporation · Mitchum v. Foster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The reversal or modification on appeal of an authorization under subsection (b) or (c) of this section of a sale or lease of property does not affect the validity of a sale or lease under such authorization to an entity that purchased or leased such property in good faith, whether or not such entity knew of the pendency of the appeal, unless such authorization and such sale or lease were stayed pending appeal.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “absurd” the argument of an appellant, a defendant in an adversary proceeding, who neither sought a stay nor filed a direct appeal of the underlying bankruptcy order but claimed that he had no obligation to appeal from a purportedly invalid and illegal order:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]o provide for an exception to statutory mootness where a portion of the overall sale required authorization under § 363(h) would `undermine § 363's role in protecting the finality of a sale in bankruptcy.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.