Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 499 F.3d 900 - Shaffer v. Potter

Shaffer v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis

499 F.3d 900 · 2007

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Griffith v. City of Des Moines · Thomas v. Corwin · Rodgers v. U.S. Bank, N.A. · Twymon v. Wells Fargo & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence that establishes a specific link between the alleged discriminatory animus and the challenged decision, sufficient to support a finding by a reasonable fact finder that an illegitimate criterion actually motivated the employment decision. Direct evidence includes evidence of conduct or statements by persons involved in the decision ]making process that may be viewed as directly reflecting the alleged discriminatory attitude, where it is sufficient to support an inference that discriminatory attitude more likely than not was a motivating factor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “evidence of conduct or statements by persons involved in the [decision-making] process that may be viewed as directly reflecting the alleged discriminatory attitude, where it is sufficient to support an inference that discriminatory attitude more likely than not was a motivating factor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “there are facts that give rise to an inference of gender discrimination”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.