499 F. Supp. 2d 1228 - Grayson v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2251 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Reading Co. v. Schweitzer · Calderon v. Thompson · Nelson v. Campbell Commissioner Alabama Department of Corrections et al. · Lovett v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Consideration of the merits' means more than a hurried hearing by a harried judge and counsel. As the Eleventh Circuit intimated in Jones [ v. Allen , 485 F.3d 635 , 640 n.2 (11th Cir. 2007) ], consideration of the merits in this circuit means full adjudication, entailing a sufficient period to conduct discovery, depose experts, and litigate the issue on the merits, including any appeals....[I]f full adjudication is not possible on a fast-track schedule here, then the issue of a stay of execution arises....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hamm v. Dunn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.