Phillips v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2010
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Russell v. United States · Riverbend Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board · United States v. Roman · 166 Ind. App. 199 - Merry v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(а) The indictment or information shall be in writing and allege the commission of an offense by: (5) stating the date of the offense with sufficient particularity to show that the offense was committed within the period of limitations applicable to that offense; (б) stating the time of the offense as definitely as can be done if time is of the essence of the offense;”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Andrews v. State · Buzzard v. State“on or about the fifth day of December, 1970 to on or about the fifth day of September, 1978.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Andrews v. State · Jones v. State“"The victim{s] gave testimony as to the sexual acts which occurred during these encounters. [They] indicated the places where these acts occurred. Although [they] did not give exact dates of all occurrences, [they] gave testimony indicating approximate time frames by reference to other activities."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Andrews v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.