499 So. 2d 1304 - State v. Fraley’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2017
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Estelle v. Williams · 445 So. 2d 1198 - State v. Wright · Cromwell v. Commerce & Energy Bank of Lafayette · 450 So. 2d 634 - State v. Nealy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Whether the clothes worn were easily identifiable as prison attire; (2) Whether the defendant was actually compelled after objection to wear the prison clothes; and (3) Whether the defendant was prejudiced by wearing the prison clothes.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The criminal intent required for forgery is to defraud any person, and it suffices if the forged instrument has prejudiced or might prejudice the rights of another. Moreover, specific intent is a state of mind and need not be proved as a fact but may be inferred from the circumstances and transactions of the case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“possessing with intent to defraud, a forged writing, known by the offender to be a forged writing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.