499 So. 2d 1311 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 1998
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 337 So. 2d 1131 - State v. Sanders · 347 So. 2d 172 - State v. Taylor · 344 So. 2d 1024 - State v. Cox · State v. Clark · 358 So. 2d 943 - State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“By contrast, LSA-R.S. 14:95.1 does not impose a greater penalty for a crime which has already been committed. Rather, LSA-R.S. 14:95.1 prohibits specified future conduct, the carrying of a concealed weapon by a convicted felon, and sets forth penalties to be expected if such conduct occurs. State v. Williams, [ 358 So.2d 943 (La.1978)] supra at 946. Although triggered by the defendant's status as a convicted felon, LSA-R.S. 14:95.1 creates an entirely new felony offense mandating a unique penalty structure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. President
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.