State v. Frith’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1992
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Giglio v. United States · 483 So. 2d 953 - State v. Garcia · 339 So. 2d 764 - State v. May · 375 So. 2d 80 - State v. Murray
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence. A bill of exceptions to rulings or orders is unnecessary. It is sufficient that a party, at the time the ruling or order of the court is made or sought, makes known to the court the action which he desires the court to take, or of his objections to the action of the court, and the grounds thereof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.