Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 499 SW2D 182 - Turner v. State

Turner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
October 1995
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 1995

16 state decisions

100197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Ker v. State of California · Harris v. United States · Hester v. United States · Southern Railway Co. v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(I)t is the duty of a policeman to investigate, and we cannot say that in striking a balance between the rights of the individual and the needs of law enforcement the Fourth Amendment itself draws the blinds the occupant could have drawn but did not.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Under this set of facts, we cannot say that appellants could ‘reasonably assume that they were free from uninvited inspection through the window’ and we must hold that no search protected by the Fourth Amendment occurred.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““This court had previously stated [in Gil v. State, 394 S.W.2d 810 (Tex.Cr.App. 1965)] the rule is that when one is so foolish as to leave his windows unsecured he may not complain if another observes an illegal act being committed therein. See also Giacona v. State, 372 S.W.2d 328 (Tex.Cr.App.1963), cert, denied, 375 U.S. 843 , 84 S.Ct. 92 , 11 L.Ed.2d 70 , and Cro-well v. State, [ 147 Tex.Cr.R. 299 , 180 S.W.2d 343 (Tex.Cr.App.1944) ]””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.