¶1ORDER
¶2Steven Tramble (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
¶3No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).