Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 A.D.3d 198

Cinque v. Schieferstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2004-03-11

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2018

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-03-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered June 27, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, awarded defendant $8,079.55 as the reasonable value of legal services rendered in responding to a prior appeal, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

¶2The award of costs for the prior appeal (292 AD2d 197 [2002]), under 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, was not merely for defending an award of sanctions, but also for preserving the dismissal of plaintiff’s baseless action (compare Henriques v Boitano, 304 AD2d 467 [2003]).

¶3We have considered the parties’ other contentions for affirmative relief and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Williams, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.

/5/ad3d/198 · .json · Public domain