Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 ALAAPP 56 - Haisten v. State

Haisten v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
November 1989
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 1989

11 state decisions

4019121920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. State · Spraggins v. State · Parsons v. State · Bain v. State · Morgan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In considering the true meaning to be placed upon [the word], due regard must be had to the connection in which it is used, and the nature of the thing to be done.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.