Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 Ark. 311

Johnston v. Glasgow

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1844

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1844-01-15

This was a judgment by confession, in Pulaski Circuit Court, at March term, A. D. 1841, before the Hon. John J. Clendenin, one of the circuit judges. Glasgow & Harrison filed a warrant of attorney executed by Johnston, empowering F. W. Trapnall, Esq., to confess judgment for him in favor of G. & H. With the power of attorney, two notes, one for $1000, and the other for $2000, executed by Johnston, and the affidavit of Trapnall, were filed.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1850

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1844-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1By the Court,

Lacy, J.

¶2In this case, there is a regular confession of judgment by a properly constituted attorney, acting under his authority. The letter of Glasgow & Harrison is in no manner connected with Johnston’s power of attorney, and consequently can neither restrain nor limit the power. The attorney, in confessing the judgment, acted in conformity with the power. There is no declaration filed in the cause. This the statute does not require. All that the party has to do in taking the judgment, is to show by his affidavit, that there is no collusion between himself and defendant. This requisite has been complied with. The judgment being taken by confession, the act expressly releases all errors, with or without process. Rev. St. chap. 116, sec. 139, p. 639. Judgment affirmed.

¶3Ashley & Watkins filed a petition for rehearing, which, at January term, 1844, was overruled.

/5/ark/311 · .json · Public domain