Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 Ark. 637

Gray v. Saffold's Administrators

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 15, 1844

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1844-07-15

This was an action of replevin, determined in the Pulaski circuit court, in September, 1842, before the Hon. John J. Clendenin, one of the circuit judges. Saffold’s administrators sued Gray, one of the heirs, for a negro belonging to the intestate. Judgment for plaintiffs exceptions, setting oat the evidence and instructions, in error.

Decided 1844-07-15

¶1By the court,

Lacy J.

¶2The main question in this case is whether an administrator of an intestate can maintain an action for the recovery of slaves against the heir. It is certain he cannot, as a general principle; and so it has been determined in Hill’s administrators vs. Mitchell. The law casts the decent of slaves upon the heir. Under certain circumstances they are made assets sub modo in the hands of the administrator for the payment of debts. If these circumstances were shown, whether or not he could maintain the action for the recovery of the possession, is a question upon which we express no opinion, as that point does not arise upon the record. Judgment reversed.

/5/ark/637 · .json · Public domain