Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 ARKAPP 284 - Sweat v. State

Sweat v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
September 1992
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Burks v. United States · Massiah v. United States · Hoffa v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “were not coerced or tricked into saying anything against their will.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “been arrested or deprived of [their] freedom in any significant way,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.