Parrish v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1961
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A motion for a new trial, however, is not a prerequisite to the review of errors apparent from the record proper — that is, from the pleadings and minute entries.” Citing Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Smith, 147 Tenn. 453 , 249 S.W. 377 ; and Board of Equalization v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry., 148 Tenn. 676 , 257 S.W. 91 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. McCandless
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.