Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 Blackf. 118

State v. Moore

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1839

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1839-05-25

<p>ERROR to the Fountain Circuit Court.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1839-05-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1882

6 state decisions

30183918401850186018701880decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Dewey, J.

¶1This was an indictment for retailing port wine by small measure without license. The defendant moved the Court to quash the indictment. The motion was sustained ; and the state excepted.

¶2The prosecution is founded upon that part of the act relative to crime and punishment, which forbids the sale “of spirituous liquor by a less quantity than a quart at a time ” without license. R. C. 1831, p. 192. That is a penal statute and must receive a strict construction. We are not at liberty to extend its meaning beyond its exact literal sense. Spirit is the name of an inflammable liquor produced by distillation. Wine is the fermented juice of the grape, or a preparation of other vegetables by fermentation. We cannot so far confound the signification of these general terms as to call wine a spirituous liquor. We think port wine is not within the purview of the statute. If its omission is an evil, the Courts have no power to remedy it.

Per Curiam.

¶3The judgment is affirmed.

/5/blackf/118 · .json · Public domain