Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 Blackf. 205

Maddox v. Pulliam

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1839

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1839-11-21

<p>After issues in fact joined in an action of debt, the defendant failed to appear. Held, that the plaintiff could not take judgment by default, but must have the issues tried by a jury. ‘ '</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1839-11-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1893

6 state decisions

201839184018501860187018801890decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Blackford, J.

¶1Pulliam sued Maddox in debt upon a writing obligatory. Plea, that the obligation was obtained by fraud and covin. Replication in denial of the plea. There were also several other pleas in bar, upon which issues were joined. When the cause was called for trial, the defendant failed to appear, and the Court, on the plaintiff’s motion, rendered final judgment against the defendant for the amount of the obligation, with interest and costs.

¶2This judgment is erroneous. The defendant’s default in not appearing at the calling of the cause after the issues joined, did not authorize the judgment rendered against him. The plaintiff should have had the issues tried by a jury in the same manner as if the defendant had appeared. 11 Petersd. 644, note.

Per Curiam.

¶3The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the issues set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

/5/blackf/205 · .json · Public domain