Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 Blackf. 383

Ransom v. Pomeroy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1840

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1840-11-24

<p>If two partners bo indebted for goods sold and delivered, and one die in the lifetime of the other, the administrator of the deceased partner may, by statute, bo sued at law for the debt.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1865

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1840-11-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Blackford, J.

¶1Assumpsit. The declaration states that Evan B. Hobson and Niles Gregory, trading in the name of Hobson & Gregory, .were indebted to the plaintiff for goods sold and delivered in the sum of 300 dollars, and in consideration thereof promised to pay, &c.; that Hobson afterwards died, and the defendant is his administrator, Gregory being still living; that payment has not been made, &c. General demurrer to the declaration and judgment for the defendant.

¶2The defendant contends that this suit could only be sustained against the surviving partner; and that is, no doubt, the common law. Bac. Abr. tit. Obi. D. 4. But our statute has changed the law on this subject. On the death of Hob-son, the plaintiff' had his choice either to sue Gregory or the administrator of Hobson. The circumstance that this is an unwritten contract does not, we think, make any difference. The defendant is the representative of Hobson, who was *384jointly bound with Gregory for the payment of a debt; and to such a case the statute applies. R. S. 1838, p. 358.

J. B. Niles, for the plaintiff.J. S. Newman, for the defendant.Per Curiam.

¶3The judgment is reversed with costs, to be levied, &c. Cause remanded, &c.

/5/blackf/383 · .json · Public domain