In Re Colbert’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2012
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 26 U.S.C. § 6013
Relies on Reed v. Reed · Tigner v. Texas · James McLamore v. South Carolina · Wetteroff v. Grand · Peltzman v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The person’s interest, not to exceed four hundred dollars, in cash on hand, money due and payable, money to become due within ninety days, tax refunds ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Baker“The person’s interest, not to exceed four hundred dollars, in any property, except that this division applies only in bankruptcy proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Baker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.