¶1Murray, C. J., concurred.
¶2This was a judgment and decree by default in a suit for divorce.
¶3The record has a certificate of service of the complaint, on the defendant, in Humboldt County, signed by “J. 0. Butler, Under-Sheriff.” This is insufficient to prove service. It is only by virtue of his official position, that the return of the Sheriff is conclusive, and of such, the Courts must take judicial notice. But the Courts cannot know an under-sheriff, and the act and return of a deputy is a nullity unless done in the name, and by the authority, of the Sheriff.
¶4The record, therefore, does not show that the defendant was brought into Court by service, and for this reason the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.