Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 Cal. 78

Howard v. Harman

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1855

California Supreme Court · decided 1855-07-01

<p>Appeal from the County Court of Yuba County.</p> <p>The facts of the case appear in the opinion of the Court.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1855-07-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1952

4 state decisions

2018551860187018801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

¶1Murray, C. J., concurred.

¶2The only point raised on the part ol the appellants is, that the County Court had no jurisdiction, because there was no appeal bond, as re*79quired by the statute, to effect an appeal from Justices of the Peace to that Court.

¶3This objection was not made in the Court below, and it comes here too late. If it had been made in proper time before the County Court, it would have been the duty of the presiding Judge to hear the excuse of the party failing to produce it, and if suEcient, to have allowed him then to have filed a bond,

¶4Judgment aErmed.

/5/cal/78 · .json · Public domain