5 Cal. 5th
Volume 5 — California Reports, Fifth Series
30 opinions
- 5 Cal. 5th 1People v. Edward (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 56People v. Hardy (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 126People v. Penunuri (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 186People v. Gonzalez (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 216Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Ledesma & Meyer Construction Co., Inc. (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 235In re Cowan (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 250People v. Ghobrial (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 295People v. Farwell (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 309County of Los Angeles v. Financial Casualty & Surety, Inc. (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 322Samara v. Matar (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 339People v. Lopez (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 372People v. Anderson (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 428Nat. Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. State of California (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 442People v. Mora & Rangel (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 522Hassell v. Bird (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 594Jameson v. Desta (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 627Lopez v. Sony Electronics, Inc. (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 642People v. Spencer (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 697People v. Woodruff (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 785In re Manriquez (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 829Troester v. Starbucks Corporation (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 857People v. Buycks (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 898Boling v. Public Employment Relations Board (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 921People v. Powell (2018)
<p> A jury convicted defendant Troy Lincoln Powell of the first degree murder of Tammy Epperson ( Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a) ) 1 and found true three special circumstance allegations: that the murder was committed while defendant was engaged in the commission of rape (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(C) ) and mayhem (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(J) ), and the murder involved the infliction of torture (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(18) ). The jury also convicted defendant of forcible rape (§ 261, subd. (a)(2) ), mayhem (§ 203), and torture (§ 206). In a separate proceeding, the jury found that defendant was sane when he committed the crimes of which he was convicted. </p> <p> The original jury was unable to reach a verdict in the penalty phase, but a newly-selected jury returned a verdict of death after a second penalty proceeding. Defendant moved for a new trial and for modification of his sentence to life without the possibility of parole. The trial court denied those motions and sentenced defendant to death. 2 This appeal is automatic. (§ 1239, subd. (b).) For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment. </p>
- 5 Cal. 5th 966De La Torre v. CashCall, Inc. (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 995Ramirez v. City of Gardena (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 1004Bianka M. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty. (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 1026Connor v. First Student, Inc. (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 1039King v. CompPartners, Inc. (2018)
- 5 Cal. 5th 1068City of Morgan Hill v. Bushey (2018)