5 Cal. App. 4th 482
Decided April 9, 1992
California Court of Appeal · decided 1992-04-09
<p>Christopher Blake, Peter A. Estern and Corinne W. Shulman, under appointments by the Court of Appeal, for Defendants and Appellants.</p>
Relies on People v. Boulerice
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1992-04-09
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably 34 Cal. 4th 494 - People v. Ramos (2004), 25 Cal. 4th 230 - In Re Resendiz (2001)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1I concur in the majority opinion in all respects, with the exception that under Discussion, section A, subtitled “Challenge to Code of Civil Procedure section 223,” I concur in the result only. I would base my holding on the reasoning expressed in People v. Boulerice, ante, page 463 [7 Cal.Rptr.2d 279], filed simultaneously with this opinion.
¶2Appellants’ petition for review by the Supreme Court was denied June 18, 1992.