People v. Chavez’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 13 Cal. 4th 497 - People v. Superior Court (Romero) · 53 Cal. 2d 370 - People v. Banks · 52 Cal. 3d 336 - Raven v. Deukmejian · 24 Cal. 3d 514 - People v. Tanner · Stephens v. Toomey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he judicial authority to dismiss a criminal action or allegation in furtherance of justice is statutory and may be withdrawn by the Legislature. [Citation.] A court may exercise such authority unless, in a given context, the Legislature has clearly evidenced a contrary intent. [Citations.] Courts will not interpret another statute as eliminating the power to dismiss under section 1385 unless there is clear legislative direction to that effect. [Citation.] But the Legislature can provide such clear direction without expressly referring to section 1385.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Avignone“section 1203.4 is the exclusive method for a trial court to dismiss the conviction of a defendant * who has successfully completed probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“provided clear legislative direction that the courts do not have authority under section 1385 to grant the requested relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.