Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 CALAPP5TH 422 - People v. Rendon

People v. Rendon’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County · People v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the only fictitious or altered bills or notes defendant possessed that had any discernable value were the two $100 bills and the three $20 bills.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “correct that the evidence here showed that the value of the altered or fictitious bills she possessed did not exceed $950.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.