Allen v. Tritch’s Empirical Analysis
1880
Citation profile
1 district · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 1998 · most notably Clark v. Duncanson (1920), Great West Min. Co. v. Woodmas of Alston Min. Co. (1888)
1 district · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hurd v. Case · Jones v. Smith · Wilson v. Forsyth · Loomis v. Tifft · Payne v. Sheldon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The supplemental proceedings provided by the Code appear to be chiefly directed to discovery.... They are not adapted, however, to reach the disputed property of the judgment debtor; no contested title to property can be determined.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The right of a judgment creditor to equitable relief in case of the fraudulent transfer of real estate by the judgment debtor is well settled. He may maintain his action to cancel the fraudulent conveyance before execution.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chalupa v. Preston
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.