Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 CONNAPP 1 - Friedlander v. Friedlander

Friedlander v. Friedlander’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kenworthy v. Kenworthy · Sillman v. Sillman · Friedlander v. Friedlander · Lavigne v. Lavigne · Kennedy v. Kennedy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . . another chapter in what has become a bitter and protracted marital dissolution dispute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 6454 - Friedlander v. Kwartin, No. Cv85-0076515 (Jul. 30, 1991)
  2. “[t]he interpretation of an agreement presents a question of fact for the trial court . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 4961 - Payor v. Jacobson, No. 31 46 50 (May 21, 1992)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.