Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 CONNAPP 12 - D'Arcy v. Shugrue

D'Arcy v. Shugrue’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

81 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently June 2009 · most notably Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of Greenwich (1987), Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. (1997)

81 state decisions

500198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc. · Mahoney v. Beatman · State v. Torrence · State v. Zayas · Tetro v. Town of Stratford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A superseding cause is an act of a third person or other force which by its intervention prevents the actor from being liable for harm to another which his antecedent negligence is a substantial factor in bringing about.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[W]here the negligent conduct of the actor creates or increases the risk of a particular harm and is a substantial factor in causing that harm, the fact that the harm is brought about through the intervention of another force does not relieve the actor of liability, except where the harm is intentionally caused by a third person and is not within the scope of the risk created by the actor's conduct.' (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Stewart v. Federated Dept. Stores, Inc. , [supra, 234 Conn. 607 -08].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “imposes liability on the commissioner for injuries suffered `through the neglect or default of the state or any of its employees by means of any defective highway . . . which it is the duty of the commissioner of transportation to keep in repair . . . .'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.