Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 Conn. Supp. 333

Knapp v. Rose

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 15, 1937

Connecticut Superior Court · decided 1937-11-15

Relies on Cotter v. Cotter

Decided 1937-11-15

BOOTH, J.

¶1The plaintiff seeks to recover remuneration for services rendered to and moneys expended for the defendant’s decedent during a period while he was a member of the decedent’s family living as one household.

¶2Such a plaintiff in order to recover must affirmatively show either that an express contract for the remuneration existed, ■or that the circumstances under which the services and expenditures were rendered and made were such as exhibit a reasonable and proper expectation that there would be compensation therefor. (Cotter vs. Cotter, 82 Conn. 331 at 332.) In the present case the plaintiff ‘failed to establish either of *334the foregoing situations.

¶3Judgment is therefore rendered for the defendant upon the issues of the complaint, and for the defendant to recover of the plaintiff her costs.

/5/connsupp/333 · .json · Public domain