5 Cow. 279
Decided February 15, 1826
New York Supreme Court · decided 1826-02-15
E. Griffin, for the defendant, moved for judgment of non pros, for not delivering a bill of particulars pursuant to an order. The declaration contained one special count with the general counts; and the order was founded upon, ■ and related to the latter. After this motion was noticed the plaintiff furnished a bill, but did not pay the costs. J. Steele opposed the application, insisting that the plaintiff could not he non prossed as to a part of the counts.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1881
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1826-02-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1We think differently. The motion must be granted as to the common counts, unless the plaintiff pay the costs of this application within thirty days. Furnishing a hill of particulars after notice given, would have been an answer to the present application, had the costs of the motion been paid up to the time of the bill furnished.
¶2Rule accordingly: