Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 F.1d 99 - Murphy v. Suliote

Murphy v. Suliote’s Empirical Analysis

5 F. 99 · 1880

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
July 1929
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 22 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 1929 · most notably The Sandringham (1882), Hall v. The Bay of Naples (1891)

9 federal appellate · 22 district ·

10018801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Post v. Jones · Corwin v. Barge Jonathan Chase

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The amount of salvage that ought to be allowed for the services performed depends on several considerations, as: First, the extent and danger of the services; secondly, the risk to which the vessels and other property employed in the service were exposed; thirdly, the value of the property saved, and the risk of destruction by which it was imperiled.””
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.