Edwards v. Chile Copper Co.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1925.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1925-02-16

2 counsel of record

Relies on Chile Copper Co. v. Edwards

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1925-02-16

¶1In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶2William Hayward, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Thomas J. Crawford, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

¶3Root, Clark, Buckner & Howland, of New York City (Arthur A. Bal-lantine, Carroll A. Wilson, and George E. Cleary, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error.

¶4Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6Judgment affirmed, on the opinion of Judge Learned Hand in the court below (294 F. 581).

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Panel

Charles Merrill Hough
Circuit Judge
Henry Wade Rogers
Circuit Judge
Martin Thomas Manton
Circuit Judge
PER CURIAM.
By the court
Read opinion →

Counsel

William Hayward, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Thomas J. Crawford, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Root, Clark, Buckner & Howland, of New York City (Arthur A. Bal-lantine, Carroll A. Wilson, and George E. Cleary, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error.