Fienup v. Kleinman’s Empirical Analysis
5 F.2d 137 · 1925
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 1983 · most notably Murphy v. Kodz (1965), Esso, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. (1938)
19 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mansfield Ry Co v. Swan · General Inv Co v. Lake Shore & M S Ry Co · Tilghman v. Proctor · Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co. · Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) A civil action or criminal prosecution commenced in a State court against any of the following persons may be removed by them to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending: (1) Any officer of the United States or any agency thereof, or person acting under him, for any act under color of such office or on account of any right, title or authority claimed under any Act of Congress for the apprehension or punishment of criminals or the collection of the revenue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Murphy v. Kodz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.