Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 F.2d 286 - Fifer v. Williams

Fifer v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

5 F.2d 286 · 1925

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
August 1988
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 1988

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

501925193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Chetwood · Cook Co Nat Bank v. United States · Casey v. Galli · Bushnell v. Leland · County of Clay v. Society for Savings

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No statute gave the objectors any legal right to demand to be heard or to be made parties to the proceeding; nor is there any statutory provision for an appeal from an order for the sale of the assets of an insolvent national bank. For an attempt to make an illegal or fraudulent sale, doubtless, a remedy by suit would lie, and from a decision in such a suit appeal could be taken to this court, but that is aside from the matter before us.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.