School District No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
5 F.3d 1255 · 1993
Citation profile
87 federal appellate · 49 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 811 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably GenCorp, Inc. v. American International Underwriters (1999), 389 Orange Street Partners v. Arnold (1999)
87 federal appellate · 49 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co. · Benjamin v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 811 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law.”
16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) mistake, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) fraud; (4) a void judgment; (5) a satisfied or discharged judgment; or (6) 'extraordinary circumstances' which would justify relief.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“failure to file documents in an original motion or opposition does not turn the late filed documents into newly discovered evidence warranting reconsideration under Rule 59(e).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.