Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 F.3d 1477 - Atlantic Thermoplastics Co. v. Faytex Corp.

Atlantic Thermoplastics Co. v. Faytex Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

5 F.3d 1477 · 1993

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
May 2017
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Transmatic Inc v. Gulton Industries Inc (1995), Maxwell v. J. Baker, Inc. (1996)

14 federal appellate · 2 district ·

280199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 44 · 35 U.S.C. § 102

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · Bibby v. United States · Kelley v. Everglades Drainage District · Ohse v. Hughes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court must review factual findings made by the district court; it may not guess at findings left unmade. Fact-finding by the appellate court is simply not permitted.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The reviewing court oversteps the bounds of its duty under Rule 52(a) if it undertakes to duplicate the role of the lower court.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Here the court's opinion is too conclusory and sparse to provide a factual basis for determining whether the invention was on sale....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.