In Re Nlo Inc et Als’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
5 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Hamilton v. Ohio Savings Bank (1998), Rulli v. Fan Co. (1997)
5 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · Hanna v. Plumer · Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co. · Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland · Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of Iowa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[rjeliance on the pure inherent authority of the court [to justify mandatory summary jury trials] is ... misplaced.” Id. Our decision, however, is based solely on the authority expressly provided by congress under Rule 16 as amended, and thus NLO continues to be binding precedent with respect to its analysis of the district court's inherent authority. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 16, Advisory Committee notes (amended December 1, 1993) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(c) Subjects to be Discussed at Pretrial Conferences. The Participants at any conference under this rule may consider and take action with respect to sjs % * % M* s¡c (7) the possibility of settlement or the use of extrajudicial procedures to resolve the dispute; * s\i sfc s)< # ¡Ü (10) the need for adopting special procedures of managing potentially difficult or protracted actions that may involve complex issues, multiple parties, difficult legal questions, or unusual proof problems; and (11) such other matters as may aid in disposition of the action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(c) Subjects to be Discussed at Pretrial Conferences. The Participants at any conference under this rule may consider and take action with respect to ****** (7) the possibility of settlement or the use of extrajudicial procedures to resolve the dispute; ****** (10) the need for adopting special procedures of managing potentially difficult or protracted actions that may involve complex issues, multiple parties, difficult legal questions, or unusual proof problems; and (l 1) such other matters as may aid in disposition of the action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.