International Union of United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Randall Division of Textron, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
5 F.3d 224 · 1993
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2015
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · First Commodity Traders, Inc. v. Heinold Commodities, Inc. · Lohorn v. Michal · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. · Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Slotky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A labor contract of indefinite duration or one that does not specify a time or manner of termination is terminable at the will of either party upon reasonable notice to the other party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.