Preze v. Board of Trustees’s Empirical Analysis
5 F.3d 272 · 1993
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2020
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Fmc Corporation v. Holliday · Gordon B. Phillips, as Guardian of James G. Phillips v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, an Indiana Corporation · Ryan v. Chromalloy American Corp. · Senkier v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance · Bernita Hammond v. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company, a Maryland Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no benefits will be paid on [claims for which a third party may be legally responsible] unless the eligible Employee ... executes a written subrogation agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.