United States v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis
5 F.3d 474 · 1993
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2019
7 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · Tompkins v. Texas · Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A selective prosecution claim clearly qualifies as such an objection.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he fact that the district court did not reject [the d]efendant's argument as waived, but instead addressed whether [the d]efendant had adequately presented a selective prosecution claim, [did] not preclude [the appellate court] from finding waiver due to untimeliness and failure to show cause.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the court for cause shown [to] grant relief from the waiver,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.