Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 F.3d 48 - United States v. Ricks

United States v. Ricks’s Empirical Analysis

5 F.3d 48 · 1993

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
January 2016
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2016

7 federal appellate · 3 district ·

80199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Kuntz v. City of Dayton · Fields v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. · Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co. · United States v. Davis

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.