Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 F.3d 531

Docket No. 93-1874.

Hall v. Ferguson

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: September 20, 1993. Filed: September 30, 1993.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-09-20

Relies on Morrison v. Olson · Robert Schmid v. United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America · Doby v. Hickerson Adc

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-09-20

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Before JOHN R. GIBSON, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Thomas Hall appeals pro se from the district court's1 orders granting judgment as a matter of law in favor of Stant, Inc., at the close of Hall's case, and granting Massey Ferguson, Inc.'s motion for judgment as a matter of law following a jury verdict in favor of Hall. Hall has not provided a copy of the trial transcript. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b). Thus, we are unable to review Hall's arguments on appeal. See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1071 (1988).

¶2

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See 8th Cir. R. 3C.

1

The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa

/5/f3d/531 · .json · Public domain