Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 F.3d 532

Docket No. 93-1198.

Inman v. Smith

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 23, 1993. Filed: September 9, 1993.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-07-23

Relies on Dock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Technologies · United States v. Mason · Rayes v. Johnson

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-07-23

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Before JOHN R. GIBSON, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Michael Inman, a Missouri inmate, appeals the magistrate judge's1 denial without prejudice of his fourth motion for appointment of counsel. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the magistrate judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion. See Rayes v. Johnson, 969 F.2d 700, 702-03 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 658 (1992).

¶2

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri

/5/f3d/532 · .json · Public domain