Austin v. Healey’s Empirical Analysis
5 F.3d 598 · 1993
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Reilly v. NatWest Markets Group Inc. (1999), Wegoland Ltd. v. NYNEX Corp. (1994)
25 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3184 · 18 U.S.C. § 3190 · 28 U.S.C. § 631 · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Singleton v. Wulff · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · United States v. Raddatz · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“considerable discretion to decide questions not raised initially in the district court”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'a federal appellate court does not consider an issue not passed upon below.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“No doubt, the evidence tying Austin to the shooting of Wilson is circumstantial, and less than overwhelming. However, the foreign government is not required to present its entire case in this country. The evidence presented need only ‘support a reasonable belief that [Austin] was guilty of the crime[s] charged.’ ”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1165 , 114 S.Ct. 1192 , 127 L.Ed.2d 542 (1994); Collins, 259 U.S. at 316 , 42 S.Ct. 469 (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.