United States v. Kahn’s Empirical Analysis
2021
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 5321 · 31 U.S.C. § 1121 · 31 U.S.C. § 5311 · 31 U.S.C. § 5314 · 31 U.S.C. § 5321 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · United States v. Nixon · Chrysler Corporation v. Brown · United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · Service v. Dulles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has firmly rejected the suggestion that a regulation is to be sustained simply because it is not 'technically inconsistent' with the statutory language, when that regulation is fundamentally at odds with the manifest congressional design”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[n]othing in [the] language [of § 5321] authorizes the Secretary to promulgate a rule that would nullify a statutory provision that was deemed necessary by Congress”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a civil penalty not to exceed the greater of the amount (not to exceed $100,000) equal to the balance in the account at the time of the violation or $25,000”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.