Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 F. App'x 335

Rodgers v. Angelone

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 19, 2001

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-03-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2001

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Rodgers v. Angelone

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-03-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Troy Wayne Rodgers seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Rodgers v. Angelone, 113 F.Supp.2d 922 (E.D.Va.2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2DISMISSED.

/5/fappx/335 · .json · Public domain