Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 FSUPP 4 - Field Packing Co. v. Glenn

Field Packing Co. v. Glenn’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
October 1987
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1987

4 state decisions

30193319401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Siler v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad · Greene v. Louisville & Interurban Railroad · Fiscal Court Owen Co. v. F. & A. Cox Co. · City of Louisville v. Pooley · Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. City of Owensboro

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This section of the Constitution has been frequently considered by the Court of Appeals of the state, and it is now well settled that this sectioi) must be read in connection with the Bill of Rights contained in the state Constitution, which forbids the exercise of arbitrary power over the lives, liberty, and property of citizens, and secures to all the inalienable right of acquiring and protecting property, and that, when so read, section 181 confers no power to prohibit or substantially prohibit, by taxation, a legitimate business, and any such prohibitory tax violates the Bill of Rights. [Citing cases.] “It is stipulated in the record that oleomargarine, as defined in the act and as sold by the plaintiff, ‘is a legitimate, well recognized, pure,, nutritious and wholesome food, which is, and for many years has been, an established subject of intrastate and interstate commerce, and is not injurious to the public health, safety, welfare or morals. Therefore, under the state law, the controversy narrows itself to the single question of whether the tax is prohibitive of the legitimate business of selling oleomargarine. In the light of the record, this question must be answered in the affirmative.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The general assembly may, by general laws only, provide for the payment of license fees on franchises, stock used for breeding purposes, the various trades, occupations and professions, or a special or excise tax.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.